<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Streaming on Media Forum</title>
    <link>https://mediaforum.net/tags/streaming/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Streaming on Media Forum</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://mediaforum.net/tags/streaming/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>NBCUniversal Puts Peacock Inside YouTube Premium, and Concedes Where the Audience Already Lives</title>
      <link>https://mediaforum.net/nbcuniversal-puts-peacock-inside-youtube-premium-and-concedes-where-the-audience-already-lives/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://mediaforum.net/nbcuniversal-puts-peacock-inside-youtube-premium-and-concedes-where-the-audience-already-lives/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Last autumn NBCUniversal was warning its viewers that its channels might go dark on YouTube TV. This July it agreed to put Peacock inside YouTube itself. The distance between those two positions is the most interesting thing about the deal.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The terms, announced on 27 July: beginning in early 2027, ad-supported Peacock Premium will be included with YouTube Premium subscriptions in the United States. Not offered as a discounted add-on, and not sold as a separate channel through the Primetime Channels storefront, but bundled in and integrated into the YouTube viewing experience, so a subscriber reaches the NFL, the Olympics, the NBA, Premier League, Universal films, Love Island USA and the Bravo catalogue without leaving the platform. NBCUniversal calls it the largest wholesale distribution arrangement Peacock has ever done, and on subscriber reach it plainly is.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Paramount Cleared 68 Regulators and Still Can&#39;t Close on Warner Bros. Discovery</title>
      <link>https://mediaforum.net/paramount-cleared-68-regulators-and-still-cant-close-on-warner-bros.-discovery/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://mediaforum.net/paramount-cleared-68-regulators-and-still-cant-close-on-warner-bros.-discovery/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;On 14 August, Paramount Skydance announced that its acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery had satisfied every regulatory clearance the deal requires. Eight months of review across 68 jurisdictions, including the United States, the European Union and China, produced no order blocking the transaction. Under the old rules of thumb, that sentence would be the end of the story.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;It isn&amp;rsquo;t close to the end of the story. Paramount has already agreed in court not to close the deal until 1 June 2027, or until the merits of the cases against it are resolved, whichever comes first.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Paramount&#39;s $111 Billion Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Stalls While Hearst Takes All of A&#43;E</title>
      <link>https://mediaforum.net/paramounts-111-billion-warner-bros.-discovery-merger-stalls-while-hearst-takes-all-of-a-e/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://mediaforum.net/paramounts-111-billion-warner-bros.-discovery-merger-stalls-while-hearst-takes-all-of-a-e/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Two deals, one week, opposite ends of the size range. Paramount&amp;rsquo;s 111 billion dollar combination with Warner Bros. Discovery is stuck in regulatory and legal delay with no clear finish date. Hearst is paying 1.2 billion to buy out Disney&amp;rsquo;s stake in A+E Global Media and take the whole thing.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The small deal closed. The enormous one didn&amp;rsquo;t. That&amp;rsquo;s the pattern worth reading, not the individual transactions.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;why-the-big-one-is-stuck&#34;&gt;Why the big one is stuck&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Deals of this size stopped being decided by antitrust economists a while ago. They&amp;rsquo;re decided by a slower mix of regulatory review, litigation from parties who don&amp;rsquo;t want the deal, political interest in who ends up owning a national news operation, and the ordinary friction of two companies trying to hold a valuation together while the calendar runs.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The BBC Is Cutting Up to 2,000 Jobs, Its Biggest Restructuring Since 2011</title>
      <link>https://mediaforum.net/the-bbc-is-cutting-up-to-2000-jobs-its-biggest-restructuring-since-2011/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://mediaforum.net/the-bbc-is-cutting-up-to-2000-jobs-its-biggest-restructuring-since-2011/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The April announcement covers between eighteen hundred and two thousand positions, roughly one in ten of a workforce of about twenty-one and a half thousand, aimed at saving around five hundred million pounds. The news division alone sheds about two hundred roles. It is the corporation&amp;rsquo;s largest restructuring in fifteen years.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The stated causes are license fee income in decline, inflation, and streaming competition. All three are true. Only one of them is interesting.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
